by Matthew Rothchild in the Progressive, October 23, 2009
Originally, the (Bank regulation) bill would have granted wide authority to the states to regulate banks more vigorously than the federal government has been doing.
A few (bank-friendly) Democrats and Republicans (on the Congressional Finance Service Committee) tried to outlaw entirely the rights of states to impose stiffer regulations.
The House ultimately compromised by allowing the Comptroller of the Currency to override the state regs if they are “significantly” at odds with the federal regs.
Well, what does “significantly” mean?